THE PROBLEM OF INTERSUBJECTIVITY IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWS OF LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN

Authors

  • Ferangiz Narzukulova Researcher of Samarkand Statе Institute of Forеign Languagеs, Lecturer at thе Samarkand branch of thе Еconomic and Pеdagogical Univеrsity Author

Keywords:

Intersubjectivity, language-games, forms of life, rule-following, private language argument, meaning, communication, social practices, philosophy of language, Wittgenstein.

Abstract

This article examines the problem of intersubjectivity in the philosophical views of Ludwig Wittgenstein, focusing on the transformation of his ideas from early logical atomism to later linguistic philosophy. The study analyzes how intersubjectivity is implicitly articulated through Wittgenstein’s concepts of language-games, forms of life, and rule-following practices. Special attention is given to the rejection of private language and its implications for understanding shared meaning and mutual comprehension among individuals. The research employs a hermeneutic and comparative methodological approach, examining primary texts such as Philosophical Investigations alongside relevant secondary literature. It argues that Wittgenstein’s later philosophy provides a non-metaphysical foundation for intersubjectivity, grounding it in socially embedded linguistic practices rather than in transcendental or purely subjective structures.

References

1.Ludwig Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1953.

2.Ludwig Wittgenstein. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1922.

3.Saul Kripke. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

4.Peter Winch. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1958.

5.

G. E. M. Anscombe. An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. London: Hutchinson University Library, 1959.

6.Norman Malcolm. Wittgenstein: A Religious Point of View? Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.

7.Edmund Husserl. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960.

8.Martin Heidegger. Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.

9.G‘aniyev E. Yoshlarda axloqiy inqiroz kuchayishida ommaviy axborot vositalarining roli //Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences. – 2025. – Т. 5. – №. 5. – С. 245-248.

10.Kubayeva S. T. Ulugbek as the innovator of the science //Europaische Fachhochschule. – 2014. – №. 5. – С. 114-116.

11.Усмонов Ф. Н. Эпистемологическая эволюция рационализма //Наука и современность. – 2012. – №. 19-1. – С. 194-198.

12.Кубаева Ш. Ўйин биосоциал тараққиёт феномени сифатида (ижтимоий-фалсафий таҳлил). falsafa va hayot философия и жизнь. Philosophy and life //Falsafa va hayot xalqaro jurnal философия и жизнь международный журнал Philosophy and life. – С. 35.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE PROBLEM OF INTERSUBJECTIVITY IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWS OF LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN. (2026). Quest Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1(4), 24-30. https://researchiapress.com/index.php/2/article/view/232

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.