ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING AND GENERAL EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES, AND HYBRID MODELS

Authors

  • Arman Rsaliyev Acting Associate Professor Author
  • Sharipova Farangiz 2nd Course Student University of Science and Technology Author

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, foreign language teaching, adaptive learning, hybrid model, cultural relevance, pedagogical design, SPEAK-BOT.

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in foreign language teaching and general education. Based on a critical synthesis of four recent studies by Rizakhojayeva (2026), Juraev (2026), Rsaliyev (2026), and Sharipova & Rsaliyev (2026), the paper examines the adaptive potential of AI, the risks of algorithmic bias, cultural irrelevance, and the loss of human interaction. The study highlights empirical evidence from China, Iran, Indonesia, Russia, and Kazakhstan. A three-level hybrid model for the distribution of functions between teachers and AI is proposed (technical-diagnostic, interpretative-adaptive, and motivational-reflective levels). The article concludes that the effectiveness of AI in education is determined not by technological power but by the quality of pedagogical design and the preservation of human-centered values.

References

1.Juraev, Sh. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference "Sustainable Development of Science and Education: New Strategies in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies", Vol. 1, pp. 1-4. Shymkent: Central Asian Innovation University. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19856221.

2.Rizakhojayeva, G. (2026). Use of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Advantages and Challenges. Collection of Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference "Development of Philology: Innovation, Methodology and Applied Research", pp. 227-233. Tashkent: University of Science and Technology. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19877258.

3.Rsaliyev, A.T. (2026). Hybrid Model of Foreign Language Teaching: Optimal Distribution of Functions between Teacher and Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference "Sustainable Development of Science and Education: New Strategies in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies", Vol. 1, pp. 3-8. Shymkent: Central Asian Innovation University.

4.Sharipova, F., & Rsaliyev, A. (2026). Teacher or Neural Network: Finding a Balance of Functions in Teaching English. Collection of Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference "Development of Philology: Innovation, Methodology and Applied Research", pp. 277-283. Tashkent: University of Science and Technology. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19877719.

5.Kravtsova, A.G. (2024). The Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Learning English. World of Science, Culture, Education, No. 4 (107), pp. 238-241.

6.Turayeva, N. (2024). Benefits of AI in English Language Classes. Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics, Vol. 2, Iss. 4, pp. 307-312.

7.Tazhenova, S. (2025). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching English. Nukus: Nukus State Pedagogical Institute, Vol. 1, pp. 67-68.

8.Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.

9.VanLehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist, Vol. 46(4), pp. 197-221.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING AND GENERAL EDUCATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES, AND HYBRID MODELS. (2026). Academicus Journal of Research, 1(5), 95-105. https://researchiapress.com/index.php/4/article/view/354

Similar Articles

61-62 of 62

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.