ASSESSMENT OF VEGETATION COVER DYNAMICS AND ECOSYSTEM DEGRADATION IN THE ARAL SEA REGION USING GIS AND SATELLITE DATA

Authors

  • Sarsenbaeva Dilnaza Adilbay qizi Second-Year Student of the Ecology and Environmental Protection Program, Karakalpak Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnologies, Nukus, Uzbekistan. Author

Keywords:

Aral Sea region, Karakalpakstan, GIS, satellite data, NDVI, NDWI, ecosystem degradation, vegetation cover, environmental monitoring, land degradation.

Abstract

This study assesses vegetation cover dynamics and ecosystem degradation in the Aral Sea region of the Republic of Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan, during 2021–2025 using Geographic Information System (GIS) technologies and satellite remote sensing data. The main objective was to identify spatial and temporal changes in vegetation cover, map environmentally degraded areas, and identify zones with potential for ecological recovery. Landsat and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery were considered for the analysis, together with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI). GIS-based thematic mapping and multi-year comparison were used to characterize changes in vegetation and surface-water conditions. NDVI provides an indicator of vegetation condition, while NDWI supports the assessment of water availability and surface moisture. The proposed approach is particularly relevant to the Aral Sea region, where water scarcity, soil salinization, climate variability, desertification, and anthropogenic pressure interact. The results and methodological framework can support environmental monitoring, sustainable land management, ecosystem restoration planning, and the identification of priority areas for ecological rehabilitation in the Aral Sea region.

References

1. Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium, NASA.

2. Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127–150.

3. Huete, A. R. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3), 295–309.

4. Gao, B. C. (1996). NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58(3), 257–266.

5. Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18–27.

6. Pettorelli, N., Laurance, W. F., O'Brien, T. G., et al. (2014). Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 839–848.

7. Reynolds, J. F., Stafford Smith, D. M., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2007). Global desertification: Building a science for dryland development. Science, 316, 847–851.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ASSESSMENT OF VEGETATION COVER DYNAMICS AND ECOSYSTEM DEGRADATION IN THE ARAL SEA REGION USING GIS AND SATELLITE DATA. (2026). Ideal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(6), 107-114. https://researchiapress.com/index.php/1/article/view/432

Similar Articles

31-40 of 46

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.